Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law

The field of comparative constitutional law has seen increasing academic interest in recent years, not least because of its considerable practical relevance. When confronted with questions concerning the drafting and interpretation of constitutions, government officials and high court judges increasingly look abroad for assistance and inspiration. Some recent constitutions even require constitutional courts to consider foreign case law before coming to a decision. One reason is that certain key constitutional principles and guarantees have come to be considered as widely accepted in spite of the prevailing differences between legal cultures. Another cause is that states which have experienced internal disturbances and seek to draft a new (or revise an existing) constitution frequently orient themselves by other countries’ constitutions and overall constitutional trends.

However, in spite of the widely acknowledged societal relevance of the emerging field, reference works are few. The situation is complicated by the fact that the field of comparative constitutional law has attracted lawyers, sociologists and political scientists alike with divergent objectives and seemingly incompatible methodological approaches, leading to a considerable fragmentation of research.

Additional Information

Guidelines for Contributors Complete List of Articles List of Constitutions

What is called for is a comprehensive, inclusive study that allows the reader to study constitutional issues both in-depth and in context (historical, conceptual, regional), allowing for wide-ranging research into related areas and topics. The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law seeks to fill this gap. In approximately 500-600 peer-reviewed entries, it will cover all areas of constitutional law from a comparative perspective, involving high-level lawyers and social scientists who represent all legal cultures, and giving due regard to the various methodologies of comparative constitutional law and regionally specific developments. Its purpose is to serve as a go-to source for constitutional scholars and practitioners everywhere.

MPECCoL is available online at www.mpeccol.com

Constitutional scholars and practitioners who are interested in contributing to the MPECCoL may direct their inquiries to .

Publisher

General Editors

Rainer Grote
Frauke Lachenmann
Rüdiger Wolfrum

Advisory Board

David J. Attard
Helmut Aust
Gautam Bhatia
David Bilchitz
Laurence Burgorgue-Larsen
Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Jongik Chon
James Crawford
Giacomo Delledonne
Charles M. Fombad
James Edward Fowkes
Justin Orlando Frosini
Babacar Kanté
Hanno Kube
David E. Landau
Liora Lazarus
Sundaresh Menon
Fred L. Morrison
Suzie Navot
Gregor Novak
Jasna Omejec
Francisco Orrego Vicuña †
Ergun Özbudun
Marie-Claire Ponthoreau-Landi
P. Chandrasekhara Rao †
Michael Riegner
Volker Röben
Cheryl Saunders
Peter-Tobias Stoll
Adrienne Stone
David Tan
Li-ann Thio
Konstantine Vardzelashvili
Christian Walter
Erika de Wet
Katja Ziegler

Funding